Formulation Patents and Dermatology and Obviousness

نویسندگان

  • Dan-Feng Mei
  • Josephine Liu
  • Michael A. Davitz
چکیده

Most patents covering dermatologic products contain patent claims directed to the pharmaceutical formulation of the product. Such patents, known as formulation patents, are vulnerable to attacks based on the legal argument that the formulations covered are obvious over formulations already known prior to the filing of the patent application. Because obviousness is an important concept in patent law, recent court cases concerning obviousness and formulation patents were examined and discussed below. Courts have ruled that patent claims are obvious when features of the claimed formulation are found in the prior art, even if the features or characteristics of the formulation are not explicitly disclosed in the prior art. However, patentees have successfully overcome obviousness challenges where there were unexpected results or properties and/or the prior art taught away from the claimed invention.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Not All Patents Are Created Equal: Bias against Predictable Arts Patents in the Post-ksr Landscape

Investment in intellectual property is considered a shrewd business strategy. However, companies that invest heavily in patenting the results of research and development may later be surprised by their inability to generate revenue from their patent portfolios. This is because those seeking to enforce patents in the predictable arts may find themselves stymied by recent developments in patent j...

متن کامل

A New Formula for Analyzing Formulation-patent Obviousness

The generic drug industry, which is estimated to save American consumers $10 billion a year,1 owes much of its current market success to Congress’s enactment of the Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984.2 The Hatch-Waxman Act sought to achieve a delicate balance, one where Americans could obtain unprecedented access to low-cost prescription medicine without somehow undermining the incentive of brand name dr...

متن کامل

Where’s the Innovation? an Analysis of the Quantity and Qualities of Anticipated and Obvious Patents

While the main theoretical benefit of patent protection is increased innovation, some assert a swamped U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has granted an inefficiently large number of patents with negligible innovation value. I test this argument’s plausibility and determine the characteristics of patents without innovation by analyzing 980 litigated patents subject to anticipation or obviousness ...

متن کامل

KSR v. Teleflex. Part 1: Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian intellectual property and regulatory rights landscape.

In KSR, SCOTUS retooled the standard for obviousness to bring it back in line with the court's previous decisions in Hotchkiss and Graham. A comparative review of the law of obviousness in the United States and Canada, and its relation to innovation and competition, was undertaken in Sections II and III. The focal point of observed differences is the inherent creativity and inventiveness of the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011